Some more commentary on SCOTUS Second Amendment review of federal gun prohibition in Rahimi
In this post, I noted that the Supreme Court in its final order list granted cert review in US v. Rahimi to address (at least) one aspect of how the landmark Bruen Second Amendment case applies to federal firearm possession criminalization. And last week, I flagged here some early commentary on the case. The interesting coverage and commentary on Rahimi and related issues keeps coming, and here are some more of the what folks are saying:
From Bloomberg Law, “Judges Confused by Supreme Court’s Historical Test for Gun Laws“
From NY Gov Kathy Hochul in New York Times, “The Supreme Court Case That Has Me Worried, for Survivors and for My State“
From Reuters, “Key gun control measure in the crosshairs at US Supreme Court“
From Slate, “SCOTUS Is Really Considering if Domestic Abusers Should Be Allowed Guns“
From Spectrum News 1, “Advocates: Next SCOTUS gun rights decision will clarify N.Y. laws“
From USA Today, “How a Second Amendment case at the Supreme Court is putting gun rights groups in a jam“
Some (of many) prior recent related posts:
- New district court opinion “holds that § 922(g)(8) is unconstitutional under Bruen‘s framework”
- Fifth Circuit panel declares unconstitutional federal prohibition on firearm possession for someone subject to domestic violence restraining order
- How long until the Supreme Court takes up another Second Amendment case after Bruen?
- With DOJ asking, will SCOTUS quickly take up a post-Bruen case on gun possession by those subject to DV orders?
- Some early commentary on SCOTUS Second Amendment review of federal gun prohibition in Rahimi