Some early takes on the Supreme Court’s supervised release work in Esteras

In this recent post reviewing the Supreme Court Term just completed, I suggested that Esteras v. United States, which addresses federal supervised release decision-making, could have significant practical impact over an important component of the federal criminal justice system.  But I am not really sure it will have that much of an impact, which makes me really sure I want to read thoughtful commentary about the case and its potential aftermath.  Thankfully, I am already seeing some Esteras commentary, mostly at my own Sentencing Matters Substack, but also at at one other locale:

Jacob Schuman at the Sentencing Matters Substack has authored “Esteras v. United States Answers Half the Question Presented“

Jonathan Wroblewski at the Sentencing Matters Substack has authored “After Esteras v. United States: Is It Time to Amend 18 U.S.C. § 3583“

Markus Funk and Spencer Gottlieb at Law360 have authored “Justices’ Sentencing Ruling Is More Of A Ripple Than A Wave“