Skip to content
Part of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Could SCOTUS address below-guideline sentences in another case?

A thoughtful reader asks:

Wouldn’t it be possible for the Surpeme Court simply to…

  1. take another case on cert for the same issue in Claiborne (there are a ton of appeals out there on the same issue; US v. Eura, which is on cert from the 4th Cir, to name just one),
  2. decide in its discretion that it doesn’t need oral argument or briefing to decide the case (certainly, it has discretion to do so),
  3. and write effectively the same decision with a different facts section? 

Is there anything stopping it from doing this?