A lethal hearing (in the wrong place?)
Howard here at How Appealing has collected some of the media coverage of the first day of the trial in federal district court concerning California’s lethal injection protocol. As this Los Angeles Times article explains, the “four-day trial here is one of several court proceedings around the nation in which lethal injection is under challenge as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.”
I continue to be disappointed, as explained in this post and this article, that scrutiny of execution processes is taking place mostly in federal district courtrooms rather than in the halls of Congress or state legislatures. As I have said before, anyone genuinely interested in federalism, or sentencing consistency, or orderly government has to find the patchwork and disparate litigation taking place in federal district courts nationwide unseemly and counter-productive. Congress could, at the very least, hold hearings to explore the medical matters at issue in all the litigation. Congress might also weigh in on the merits by encouraging states to adopt an improved lethal injection protocol.
Of course, there are pros and cons to legislative action in this context. But the basic question and concern is whether, in a society committed to democratic decision-making, Congress should just sit on the sidelines while important matters of life and death unfold in court.
Some related posts: